AI governance for legal teams.
Built by someone who has done the work.

I help legal teams govern AI before it governs them.

Most legal organizations are using AI tools right now without a policy, without a review protocol, and without a documented accountability structure. That gap is not an IT problem. It is a professional responsibility problem, and it lands on the attorneys and legal operations leaders who signed off on the tools.

My work is building the governance infrastructure that closes that gap: assessments, frameworks, and systems grounded in how legal teams actually operate, not how vendors describe them.

Seven years inside high-stakes legal operations.

My career started inside one of the most operationally demanding legal environments that exists: the U.S. Army JAG Corps. As a paralegal and legal operations practitioner, I managed court-martial case operations, built analytics infrastructure from scratch, and designed triage systems where missed deadlines carry statutory consequences. Not just professional ones.

That included managing a no-body homicide investigation involving 23 TB of digital evidence, designing Power BI and SharePoint dashboards tracking 100 to 200 active federal crime cases, and training 60 to 150 legal professionals on workflows, compliance tools, and digital evidence systems across multiple offices.

That experience shaped a specific standard: legal operations is not a support function. It is a command-and-control system that either works or doesn't. I have carried that standard into AI governance work, where the stakes are the same and the frameworks are still being built.

The Aegis Protocol.

The Aegis Protocol is a proprietary nine-domain AI governance assessment framework I developed for legal organizations. It runs across Organizational Readiness, AI Inventory, Policy and Documentation, Attorney Oversight, Data Governance, Vendor Management, Risk Management, Training and Awareness, and Regulatory Compliance. Every engagement produces documented findings, evidence-backed recommendations, and a governance report the organization can defend to a board, a regulator, or a court.

The platform includes modules for EU AI Act compliance diagnostics, state AI law mapping, agentic AI governance, and adversarial stress testing of deployed AI systems. It is not a vendor product. It is a consulting infrastructure built to the standard the work demands.

Certified. Field-tested. Still building.

Governance and Project Management

Legal Operations and Technology